INSTANT NEWS

In a recent exchange, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar attributed Nigeria's economic challenges to the "poor policies" of President Bola Tinubu. However, the Presidency responded, accusing Atiku of hypocrisy and failing to propose better policy alternatives. Atiku criticized Tinubu's economic policies, stating that they are causing pain, despair, and a shrinking private sector. He also questioned the effectiveness of Tinubu's budget and characterized his initiatives as uninformed and chaotic.

On the other hand, the Special Adviser to the President on Information & Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, dismissed Atiku's criticism, claiming it reflects a mission as a poor opposition figure. Onanuga defended Tinubu's reforms, including the removal of petrol subsidy and harmonization of exchange rates, emphasizing their long-term benefits. He countered Atiku's claims about a shrinking private sector and multinational companies leaving, stating they are not grounded in facts.

The Presidency highlighted Tinubu's acknowledgment that the reforms would cause immediate pain but insisted they are essential for future prosperity. Onanuga urged Atiku to be honest about the inherited weak economy and commended President Tinubu's focus on solving economic and security challenges through fiscal and tax policy reforms. Despite Atiku's criticism, the Presidency emphasized its commitment to nation-building and economic recovery initiated by President Tinubu.

The People's Democratic Party (PDP) expressed its deep disappointment with the Supreme Court's verdict regarding the appeals filed by Atiku Abubakar of the PDP and Peter Obi of the Labour Party. The Supreme Court dismissed these appeals, stating that they lacked merit.

In a statement signed by the PDP's spokesman, Debo Ologunagba, the party conveyed its concerns about the Supreme Court's reasoning. The PDP believed that the judgment contradicted the express provisions of the Nigerian Constitution, the Electoral Act, 2022, and the guidelines and regulations set by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the 2023 presidential election.

The party criticized the Supreme Court for what it perceived as a failure to uphold the law. The PDP emphasized that many Nigerians had expected the Supreme Court to uphold the constitutional requirements for a presidential election in Nigeria, including the need to secure at least 25% of votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). They also raised concerns about violations of electoral rules, manipulations of election results by the All Progressives Congress (APC), and the condoning of issues related to forgery, falsehood, and perjury based on technicalities.

The PDP expressed its deep concerns about the overall impact of the Supreme Court's judgment, as it seemed to have shaken Nigerians' confidence in the judiciary, especially in the Supreme Court's role as the last hope for the common people.

Despite this disappointment, the PDP urged Nigerians not to be discouraged and to remain committed to the pursuit of a credible electoral system that genuinely reflects the will of the people.

In summary, the PDP's statement highlighted its dismay at the Supreme Court's judgment and its concern for the implications it holds for Nigeria's democracy. It also emphasized the importance of continuing the pursuit of transparent and credible elections.

In the latest legal development concerning the 2023 general election in Nigeria, the Supreme Court has upheld Bola Tinubu's election as the President of the country. This decision comes after challenging appeals by his major opponents, Atiku Abubakar of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) and Peter Obi of the Labour Party.

Atiku and Obi had originally sought to have the election results overturned, arguing that they should be declared winners instead. They approached the election tribunal to nullify Tinubu's victory as declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). These appeals were dismissed, prompting them to bring their case to the Supreme Court.

At the Supreme Court, Atiku attempted to introduce new evidence of alleged forgery against Tinubu. However, the court dismissed this appeal on Thursday, citing that the issue of forgery was not part of the initial appeal presented at the tribunal, and the time allotted for filing new evidence had already expired.

Justice John Okoro further explained that the appellants did not apply for an extension of time or request to amend their appeal to include the issue of forgery, and even if they had, it wouldn't have been granted. He emphasized that the lower court, guided by the provisions of section 285 Sub 6 of the state constitution, had lost jurisdiction in dealing with the matter.

One of the arguments presented was that Tinubu couldn't be declared President as he had failed to secure 25% of the votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, which ruled that Abuja/FCT should be considered as the 37th state for the purpose of calculating the two-thirds majority needed to declare a presidential candidate as the election winner.

Regarding the electronic transmission of results, the Supreme Court ruled that the election couldn't be nullified due to the Independent National Electoral Commission's (INEC) failure to transmit results electronically. Justice Okoro stated that the absence of electronic result transmission (iREV) couldn't be used as grounds for election nullification, as it hadn't affected the overall election results.

Additionally, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by Peter Obi, who sought to disqualify Tinubu over the double nomination of Vice President Kashim Shettima. The justices noted that this matter had already been addressed in a previous Supreme Court judgment.

This recent Supreme Court ruling adds another chapter to the legal disputes surrounding Nigeria's 2023 presidential election. In May, the Supreme Court had previously dismissed a suit filed by the PDP, stating that the party lacked locus standi to bring the case to court.