INSTANT NEWS

The 12th Annual Zik Lecture Series featured insightful discussions by prominent figures, including the former Prime Minister of Malawi, Joyce Banda, Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State, Governor Chukwuma Soludo of Anambra, and the Presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the last general elections, Mr Peter Obi. The speakers explored ways to propel Africa forward and enhance its competitiveness on the global stage.

Joyce Banda, addressing the challenge of poverty and corrupt leadership, urged Africans to unite for meaningful growth and development. She emphasized the need to address corruption within African leadership, drawing attention to organized crimes and looting that hinder the continent's progress. Banda also advocated for the active involvement of African women in discussions related to the upliftment of women and the importance of addressing climate change for sustainable development.

Governor Seyi Makinde stressed the importance of restructuring Nigeria to strengthen political and socio-economic unity. He called for a comprehensive restructuring that considers the most effective structure for the country, emphasizing the need to move beyond ethnic divisions and promote healthy competition for national progress. Makinde highlighted the national outlook of Zik of Africa and his belief in the indivisibility of Nigeria.

Peter Obi, the guest of honour, emphasized the critical role of dismantling criminality among leaders to overcome the challenges facing Africa. He pointed to leadership as the root cause of the continent's struggles and called for concerted efforts to eliminate criminal elements within African leadership.

In summary, the Zik Lecture Series provided a platform for thought-provoking discussions on the way forward for Africa, addressing issues of corruption, leadership, restructuring, and the need for unity to foster development on the continent.

Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the last presidential election, has criticized the 2023 supplementary budget, claiming it highlights the Federal Government's insensitivity to the needs of the masses and the nation's urgent emergencies.

Obi expressed his disappointment that the supplementary budget did not adequately address the pressing national needs and emergencies facing the country. President Bola Tinubu recently signed the 2023 supplementary appropriation bill, totaling N2.17 trillion.

The supplementary budget allocation of N605 billion for security was emphasized, intended to enhance the capabilities of the armed forces and security agencies to address current and emerging security challenges. Other provisions included N5.5 billion for a student loan scheme and over N616 billion in wage awards for civil servants to mitigate the increased cost of living post-subsidy.

In response, the Senate has announced its intention to investigate the purchase of a N5 billion presidential yacht and the circumstances surrounding it.

Peter Obi expressed his concerns on Twitter, emphasizing that a supplementary budget should prioritize national welfare needs not initially addressed in the main budget. He pointed out that the supplementary budget came late in the financial year and should primarily focus on urgent national welfare items.

Obi referred to a report from the United Nations and the World Food Programme, projecting that about 6.5 million Nigerians would suffer from hunger in 2024, primarily in Sokoto, Adamawa, Borno, Yobe, and Zamfara States. He suggested that the supplementary budget could have addressed this impending catastrophe by providing provisions to mitigate the threat.

He further criticized the fact that the supplementary budget included extravagant expenditures such as a presidential yacht, presidential jets, and the furnishing of lavishly furnished presidential quarters and offices, rather than focusing on urgent social welfare issues.

Obi's tweets highlighted the government's lack of awareness of the country's crisis and the government's disconnection from the suffering of the general population. He concluded that the majority of the funding for these lavish expenses would be borrowed, emphasizing the need for empathy and realism from the government during these challenging times, rather than extravagant indulgence.

The People's Democratic Party (PDP) expressed its deep disappointment with the Supreme Court's verdict regarding the appeals filed by Atiku Abubakar of the PDP and Peter Obi of the Labour Party. The Supreme Court dismissed these appeals, stating that they lacked merit.

In a statement signed by the PDP's spokesman, Debo Ologunagba, the party conveyed its concerns about the Supreme Court's reasoning. The PDP believed that the judgment contradicted the express provisions of the Nigerian Constitution, the Electoral Act, 2022, and the guidelines and regulations set by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the 2023 presidential election.

The party criticized the Supreme Court for what it perceived as a failure to uphold the law. The PDP emphasized that many Nigerians had expected the Supreme Court to uphold the constitutional requirements for a presidential election in Nigeria, including the need to secure at least 25% of votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). They also raised concerns about violations of electoral rules, manipulations of election results by the All Progressives Congress (APC), and the condoning of issues related to forgery, falsehood, and perjury based on technicalities.

The PDP expressed its deep concerns about the overall impact of the Supreme Court's judgment, as it seemed to have shaken Nigerians' confidence in the judiciary, especially in the Supreme Court's role as the last hope for the common people.

Despite this disappointment, the PDP urged Nigerians not to be discouraged and to remain committed to the pursuit of a credible electoral system that genuinely reflects the will of the people.

In summary, the PDP's statement highlighted its dismay at the Supreme Court's judgment and its concern for the implications it holds for Nigeria's democracy. It also emphasized the importance of continuing the pursuit of transparent and credible elections.

In the latest legal development concerning the 2023 general election in Nigeria, the Supreme Court has upheld Bola Tinubu's election as the President of the country. This decision comes after challenging appeals by his major opponents, Atiku Abubakar of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) and Peter Obi of the Labour Party.

Atiku and Obi had originally sought to have the election results overturned, arguing that they should be declared winners instead. They approached the election tribunal to nullify Tinubu's victory as declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). These appeals were dismissed, prompting them to bring their case to the Supreme Court.

At the Supreme Court, Atiku attempted to introduce new evidence of alleged forgery against Tinubu. However, the court dismissed this appeal on Thursday, citing that the issue of forgery was not part of the initial appeal presented at the tribunal, and the time allotted for filing new evidence had already expired.

Justice John Okoro further explained that the appellants did not apply for an extension of time or request to amend their appeal to include the issue of forgery, and even if they had, it wouldn't have been granted. He emphasized that the lower court, guided by the provisions of section 285 Sub 6 of the state constitution, had lost jurisdiction in dealing with the matter.

One of the arguments presented was that Tinubu couldn't be declared President as he had failed to secure 25% of the votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, which ruled that Abuja/FCT should be considered as the 37th state for the purpose of calculating the two-thirds majority needed to declare a presidential candidate as the election winner.

Regarding the electronic transmission of results, the Supreme Court ruled that the election couldn't be nullified due to the Independent National Electoral Commission's (INEC) failure to transmit results electronically. Justice Okoro stated that the absence of electronic result transmission (iREV) couldn't be used as grounds for election nullification, as it hadn't affected the overall election results.

Additionally, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by Peter Obi, who sought to disqualify Tinubu over the double nomination of Vice President Kashim Shettima. The justices noted that this matter had already been addressed in a previous Supreme Court judgment.

This recent Supreme Court ruling adds another chapter to the legal disputes surrounding Nigeria's 2023 presidential election. In May, the Supreme Court had previously dismissed a suit filed by the PDP, stating that the party lacked locus standi to bring the case to court.